Selling a Workplace That Still Looks Like a Car Park

Turn up for a viewing on a freshly stripped-out floor in Farringdon, Spinningfields or Snow Hill and there's frankly not much to look at. Bare slab, a forest of cable trays, a couple of builders' lamps on stands and, if you're lucky, a radiator that works. And yet the agent walking you round may well have two other occupiers circling, heads of terms half agreed.

Letting space before the fit-out is finished is nothing new. What has changed is how much it now depends on what tenants can see, and how little patience they have for imagining it.

Tenants want certainty

Since 2020, the balance of power in offices has shifted firmly towards whoever is signing the lease. Headcounts on the floor plan are down; expectations per square foot have gone the other way. Ask a property director for their wish list today and you'll hear about project zones, phone booths, a proper kitchen people actually want to sit in, showers, somewhere to pray or decompress, and a reception that doesn't embarrass anyone when a client walks in.

Try reading any of that off a CAD plan. Someone weighing up three buildings wants to picture a damp Tuesday in February with half the team in, not a schematic with tiny circles for chairs. Will the meeting rooms be bright enough? Will the kitchen genuinely pull people out from behind their screens at lunch? Does the front door say "serious firm" or "budget co-working"?

Landlords who can answer that in the first meeting, rather than the fourth, tend to win the letting.

Showing, not describing

Which is why the leasing pack has quietly changed. Out go the mood boards and the borrowed photos of somebody else's building. In comes office 3D visualisation of the floor in question, drawn from the real plans and the actual proposed fit-out, so what a tenant sees is what they'd be signing for.

The images can show the space at different stages and for different occupiers. A Cat A version for tenants who want to bring their own designer. A fully fitted Cat B option for those who want to move in quickly. A version with a larger kitchen, or more meeting rooms, or a different layout for a specific tenant.

For agents, that changes the conversation. Instead of saying "imagine this as a breakout area", they can show it, in the right light, with the right furniture, from the right angle.

Faster decisions, fewer surprises

Visuals help on the occupier side too. Most office decisions get made partly by people who will never set foot on the floor before signing (the CFO, a board in Frankfurt or Boston, the people team). Give the property lead six good images and the internal business case writes itself a lot faster.

They also take some of the sting out of handover day. If the tenant signed off the finishes and layout from a picture, there's far less room for the "that's not what we were shown" conversation six months later. Design teams get to spot the obvious howlers early, like the boardroom with no window or the tea point marooned at the far end of the floor, before a single stud wall goes up.

There's a money argument too, and it's not complicated. A floor sitting empty racks up rates, service charge and insurance every single month it's dark. Set that against the cost of a decent set of images and a short walkthrough, and if the visuals shave even a few weeks off the void, they've paid for themselves several times over. Finance teams on the landlord side tend to get that maths very quickly.

The flex operators got there first

Flexible workspace operators worked this out years ago. When you're selling a 12-person suite on a one-year deal, you can't wait for the joinery to be finished before marketing it, so the bigger operators have long shown suites, lounges and meeting rooms in near-photographic images weeks before opening. Traditional landlords, brought up on ten-year leases and long negotiations, were slower off the mark. They're closing the gap now, mostly because they've watched flex suites let first.

What tenants should ask

For occupiers, a few questions keep everyone honest. Were these pictures made from this month's drawings, or are they leftovers from the planning stage? That nice sofa in reception, is it part of the deal or just set dressing? What's the Cat A specification underneath the fitted version? And can we see the space from where our desks will actually be, not just the hero shot of the reception? A landlord who answers those calmly is usually one worth doing business with.

Not a substitute for substance

To be clear, a pretty render won't save a bad building. Occupiers still grill landlords on the walk from the station, EPC ratings, air handling, cycle storage and, more and more, the building's carbon story. No image covers up stuffy air or a fifteen-minute trudge in the rain.

But in a competitive market, where several buildings may tick the same boxes, the ability to show a finished workplace early can be what tips a decision.

What it means for landlords

So what should landlords actually do differently? Start thinking about the leasing story while the architect's still sketching, not once the contractor has packed up and gone home. Settle on a couple of fit-out packages, make sure the renders show real specs (nobody's fooled by catalogue fantasy for long), and update them every time the design shifts.

The bare concrete floor will always be part of the process. Increasingly, though, it isn't what tenants are buying. They are buying the workplace they can see on the screen, and the confidence that it will be delivered.

‍